New Toy – 14mm f/2.8 Prime

Nikon 14mm f/2.8 Ultra Wide, Ultra Small, Ultra Cute!

There’s nothing more exciting to a photographer than acquiring a new lens. Today I received my 14mm f/2.8, finally a wide-angle for my full-frame camera!

I had put off getting a wide-angle when I bought my D700 because I find that I don’t always go wider than 24mm. I use my favorite 24-70mm about 90% of the time, and it usually gets the job done. But lately there have been a few instances that I wished I had something wider. When  I was in Valencia, for instance, I could not get the Opera House covered in one frame even if I backed up into the middle of the road and oncoming traffic! And yes, I’ve considered that.

I did have other choices when I was making my decision on what to get.  Since I had the Nikon 24-70mm and the 70-200mm, the 14-24mm did come to mind (very briefly though) — those are the perfect trio of lenses that Nikon users like to call the “trifecta” or the “holy trinity” of lenses. But aside from its jaw-dropping price,  the 14-24mm turned me off due to its humongous size. I have no doubt it’s a beautiful lens as I have yet to see a bad review of it, but it had more cons to me than pros, the biggest of which is the weight which I can no longer handle when accompanied by my other 2 monstrous lenses.

I also considered another Sigma (15-30mm) since I was happy with the last Sigma I had. I had the Sigma 10-20 for my D200 and was impressed by it. But I thought the 15-30mm was still a little too big for my use.

And then there’s also the new Nikon 16-35mm which everyone I know seem to have these days. Still a little too big.

So, what it all came down to for me, other than quality, is the size and weight. Since I seem to need a wide-angle for only about 10% of the time as of yet, I looked at primes. The 14mm seems to fit the bill. It’s a nice chunk of metal in a sturdy compact size, weighs 670 grams, and it feels nice on my little fingers. As Ken Rockwell has said, “It feels like an iron softball,” and it sure does. It has a 114-degree picture angle and fast f/2.8 aperture (although I don’t think I’ll need that for my shooting style),  aspherical, superior ED glass (ED stands for extra dough! in my opinion), and with what I’ve read it’s perfect for architectural photography because it’s rectilinear  which means little barrel distortion and more straight lines. I do a lot of architectural photography, so this appeals to me.

I have not taken this baby out for a road test yet, so I can’t back up what I’ve just said. But I will let you know, or you can judge for yourself when you see my photos. Hopefully, it won’t put a damper to all these excitement.


3 responses

  1. Yen!
    congratultions! I am looking forward to seeing one of your marvellous picks with this new lens!!! it must be amazing, but more amazing in your hands!
    a hug,

    • Hi Jude! I have not taken the lens out on a road test yet, and I’m quite nervous – I just hope I made the right choice of wide-angle. I hope to be able to use it soon though, and don’t worry you’ll see the results – good ones, hopefully. 🙂

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: